Announcing the beginning of 3.2 development work !

Another milestone in the course of bM ! :D

I here by announce the beginning of the development of the next version of boastMachine, i.e, v3.2

3.2 will be a cleaner version with bugs from 3.1 fixed (not many though ;) ).

Its's core will be made more object oriented. (bM lacks that feature).

Many simple and lite features would be add, like these..
- Stats
- Private blog
- Mail to blog (addon)
- Wap module (under dev)

The major features that are going to be added are
- Plugin API
- Blog API (like blogger.com)

I hope to complete this version in a few months, but that will depend on the time I get The fact is that its possible to implement all these in less than a week but time is a crucial factor for me.

Let me know.. ! icon_exclaim
Posted by World Forum   www
on July 10, 2005, 12:23 pm
boastMachine is great!!
Just can't wait to see this new stuff :-)
Regards, folks at World Forum

( Reply to this comment )
Posted by Mykkal   www
on July 11, 2005, 12:44 pm
Hey how far along are you?

( Reply to this comment )
Posted by Mike   www
on July 21, 2005, 10:00 am
I'd love to know if you have any date in mind as well... cuz I'd like to know if i should update to 3.1 or wait till 3.2 is out.

( Reply to this comment )
Posted by Megavolt   www
on July 28, 2005, 2:22 pm
The Blog API willl be a really nice feature to have, it's quite possibly the ONLY feature I miss from Bblog ...

Just when you think Boast Machine can't get much better, you find even more cool features to add.
tres kewl 8)

Keep up the good work

( Reply to this comment )
Posted by AA  
on July 31, 2005, 1:13 am
I have an important feature suggestion. It's not a lot but very important for me.
Right now the <title> is displayed like this
Blogname :: category :: news title

I hate that. I just want the title to be:
News title

isn't that possible?

( Reply to this comment )
Posted by noaim   www
on August 9, 2005, 4:50 pm
Is it a possiblity that a future version will include a message board option using the same user database?

( Reply to this comment )